Isn’t assessing the issue on the issue tracker “listening to input” though?
Your options are
- do it yourself and create a pull request
- make a suggestion to the devs on the issue tracker, who have every right to reject it
- start a discussion here if you believe a feature is important enough to have public debate
That seems like a lot of options for listening to input to me.
What exactly is missing that you want to see? How could you add what you see is missing?
A study just came out that was posted in Hexbear showing at least 15% of Reddit content is corporate botting so we should just have some fun with LLMs and AstroTurf it instead like everyone else is doing