Oh. I’m absolutely including a private CA as part of self signed cert. That’s probably my misuse of the term
- 0 Posts
- 7 Comments
you are unable to protect against MitM and other forgery attacks
Uhh, using a self signed cert doesn’t mean you just accept any old cert… Not every cert is designed for serving content to a browser. You do SSL mutual auth between services using self signed certs
Basically with self signed certs, you control the ENTIRE trust chain. When you use existing CAs, any bad actor in any of those CAs can generate certs that you would end up trusting. So it’s less secure because you have to trust a lot more people.
but they fix a lot more problems than they cause
I didn’t say anything that disagrees with this. CAs are nice and convenient. They do this by expanding the chain of trust to a lot more people, hence making them less secure.
Sure if you can’t securely manage your cert, that’s a problem. But that doesn’t mean let’s less secure
They’re more secure than CA certs
Fal@yiffit.netto
Sysadmin@lemmy.world•You have a organizational identity right?English
310·3 years agoSelf signed certs are more secure. You don’t have to trust the whole CA chain
Also why not come in later and take that time in the morning?