

That’s a very unreformed/uninformed answer! There are many places in the New Testament where the writers very clearly state that an Old Testament passage was referring to Jesus Christ, even though those passage don’t mention Jesus Christ by name. The New Testament is absolutely brimming with them. Way before the 19th century, and way too many to account for by irresponsibly throwing out the word “edits” so don’t try that


I don’t know what you mean about “authenticity,” but between Homer’s writings, Plato’s writings, and the Bible (OT & NT separately) the NT has:
And the OT and NT together have:
This when compared to the works of Plato & Homer (we don’t need to mention Socrates because he doesn’t have any written work preserved at all). They are as authentic, and moreso in some areas, as any ancient writing.
As to truthfulness, I’ve already spoken archaeologically, but referring to the spiritual content, I wouldn’t presume to convince you.
This is Reformed Theology. There is a passage in Romans 9 that is very unpopular these days, but we embrace it. It goes like this:
I do want you to know, I hope God has mercy on you. Along with Paul,