yeehaw

I’ve used their switches and access points extensively. Great stuff IMO. As someone else said, they’re similar to Cisco in syntax.

They also have all the high end features you’d need if you’re comparing to cicso and juniper.

Juniper. Their licensing team has taken nearly a year and have not sorted out my licensing. Rip off.

I used Arch btw

Isn’t that what canonical was trying to do for years now?

Correct, it’s not really accurate to compare kubernetes to lxc. It’s a container orchestration tool.

Ok I’m not sure what your point is then. VMware clustering isn’t free either.

I’m not sure what you’re talking about. That’s how hyperv has always been deployed. Install Microsoft server, install hyperv role. It’s a hypervisor. Does all the fancy things like clustering as well, through the fail over cluster manager where you can view all your hosts, move vms from host to host, configure your witnesses etc. It absolutely is a competitor in the esxi space, never had quite all the bells and whistles but it was good enough for most applications.

Ye ol “free” hyper-v as well. Would probably be the next one I consider in a corporate environment after VMware just blew it’s brains out. Containers are great, I run kubernetes at one on truenas scale but obviously it’s Linux containers which may have some implications if the idea is to move everything off VMware to containers. Like if there are windows vms.